-
Posts
5,686 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Hyna's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
- Rare
- Rare
- Rare
Recent Badges
Single Status Update
-
Pfft...who needs laws.
- Show previous comments 3 more
-
The fact that intent is required to prove crime is part of our law, and has been for a long time before Hillary. You've decided that your talk radio facts are so compelling that we should ignore actual laws, which I doubt you bothered to look into. You claim, for example, that her having the server or using personal e-mail were illegal - they were not at that time. Whether her conduct was ethical or appropriate is absolutely debatable. But you're not entitled to complain about others ignoring laws when (a) you don't know what those laws were and (b) you would prefer we ignore them whenever it suits your personal politics.
Fact check: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/mar/12/hillary-clintons-email-did-she-follow-all-rules/
-
This morning's Washington Post (one of a handful of credible news sources left in our media) carries this editorial: